<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Monster Bighole Brown Part 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://willfishforwork.com/2009/06/29/monster-bighole-brown-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://willfishforwork.com/2009/06/29/monster-bighole-brown-part-2/</link>
	<description>Montana Fly Fishing blog with river flows, guide information, reports, weather, fly shops, fly tying, photography and news from the outdoors.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 01:08:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Franklin Moquette</title>
		<link>http://willfishforwork.com/2009/06/29/monster-bighole-brown-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-20745</link>
		<dc:creator>Franklin Moquette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 07:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willfishforwork.com/?p=853#comment-20745</guid>
		<description>Coming from Europe, where brown trout and European grayling are happily living together in thousands of streams, I don&#039;t see the problem. On the other hand: brown tout is an invasive species in this case and the Montana grayling hasn&#039;t evolved together with the brown trout like the European grayling did. So there may be a problem.
I am bit amused by the uproar caused by the fact that the sportfisher who caught the monster brown trout, did not put his trophy trout back! This fish had lived a full life and probably made many contributions to the propagation of its species. It was in fact already &#039;over the top&#039;. What is the reason for catch &amp; release then? Do we execute C&amp;R just to give someone else the chance to catch the same tropy trout the next week or the next month?
Franklin Moquette
The Netherlands, Europe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coming from Europe, where brown trout and European grayling are happily living together in thousands of streams, I don&#8217;t see the problem. On the other hand: brown tout is an invasive species in this case and the Montana grayling hasn&#8217;t evolved together with the brown trout like the European grayling did. So there may be a problem.<br />
I am bit amused by the uproar caused by the fact that the sportfisher who caught the monster brown trout, did not put his trophy trout back! This fish had lived a full life and probably made many contributions to the propagation of its species. It was in fact already &#8216;over the top&#8217;. What is the reason for catch &amp; release then? Do we execute C&amp;R just to give someone else the chance to catch the same tropy trout the next week or the next month?<br />
Franklin Moquette<br />
The Netherlands, Europe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monster Bighole Brown &#124; Willfishforwork.com</title>
		<link>http://willfishforwork.com/2009/06/29/monster-bighole-brown-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-2875</link>
		<dc:creator>Monster Bighole Brown &#124; Willfishforwork.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 01:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willfishforwork.com/?p=853#comment-2875</guid>
		<description>[...] I got a call from Bruce, read about it here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I got a call from Bruce, read about it here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

